| ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
| Year : 2017 | Volume
: 19
| Issue : 2 | Page : 96-98 |
|
|
Induction of labor: Our experience
Sushil Chawla, Santosh Kumar Singh, Monica Saraswat, Sakthi Vardhan
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AFMC, Pune, Maharashtra, India
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Santosh Kumar Singh
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AFMC, Pune, Maharashtra
India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/jmms.jmms_51_17
|
|
|
Introduction: Induction of labor is a deliberate attempt to terminate the pregnancy with the aim of vaginal delivery in cases of valid indication. Different methods are being used ranging from nonpharmacological to pharmacological for the same. Induction on demand by patients is also rising in our country. Objectives: The aim of this study is to ascertain the common indications for induction of labor at a tertiary care teaching hospital. Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study, with the study group being all the patients who underwent induction of labor and the total population including all the women delivering at our center, in 1 year. The induction was done using “Dinoprostone” gel or tablet “Misoprostol”. Results: Postdated pregnancy was the reason for induction of labor in 36% of the patients. Hypertensive disorders and gestational diabetes mellitus are other common conditions requiring induction of labor. Pregnancy following assisted reproductive techniques form an important group requiring induction of labor in present day practice. Conclusion: Hypertensive disorders and postdated pregnancy are the most common indication for induction of labor.
|
|
|
|
| [FULL TEXT] [PDF]* |
|
 |
|
