|LETTER TO EDITOR
|Ahead of print publication
Cow dung – An unusual cause of halitosis
Saurabh Sud1, Saumya Shree2, Saurabh Bhardwaj3, Urikhimbam Surnaprity Devi2
1 Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Siachen Military Hospital, Ladakh, India
2 Department of Dental Sciences, Siachen Military Hospital, Ladakh, India
3 Department of Administration, Siachen Military Hospital, Ladakh, India
|Date of Submission||28-Jul-2021|
|Date of Decision||31-Jul-2021|
|Date of Acceptance||01-Sep-2021|
|Date of Web Publication||21-Jan-2022|
Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Siachen Military Hospital, Ladakh - 194 401
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Halitosis, also known as fetor oris/oral malodor/morning breath/stomato dysodia/fetor ex-ore or bad breath, is a universal medico-social problem in all communities. The incidence of oral malodor ranges from 22% to 50% with highest in 18–29 years' age group (47.8%) with males outshining females (55% vs. 45%)., People residing in high-altitude areas (HAAs) have more incidence of halitosis as compared to people residing in plains. Extreme low temperatures, low oxygen content, scarcity of nutritious diet, less availability of drinking water, low fluoride content (<0.02 parts per ml/l) in drinking water, poor socioeconomic conditions with low literacy rate, and minimal presence of dental treatment centers, are some of the common causes for halitosis in HAAs.
We present a rare cause of halitosis seen commonly in people of Nubra Valley of Ladakh region. Miyazaki et al. broadly divided halitosis into genuine halitosis, pseudo-halitosis, and halitophobia. Genuine halitosis is pathological or physiological. Physiological halitosis is also called morning halitosis. Pathological halitosis is due to intraoral (87%) and extraoral (13%) causes. Intraoral causes include tongue coating (most common cause of halitosis, 80%–90%), poor oral hygiene, oral infections, and dental and periodontal conditions. Extraoral causes include sinusitis, tonsillitis, rhinitis, foreign bodies, tobacco and betel nut chewing, smoking, alcohol, and gastrointestinal problems. Pseudo-halitosis is a complaint of halitosis without its actual existence. Halitophobia is just fear of halitosis without its actual existence and is attributable to a form of delusion or monosymptomatic hypochondriasis.
The primary mechanism for halitosis is presence of the volatile sulfide compounds (hydrogen sulfide, dimethyl sulfide, and methyl mercaptan), diamines (putrescine and cadaverine), and short-chain fatty acids (butyric acid, valeric acid, and propionic acid) resulting from the proteolytic degradation by anaerobic Gram-negative oral microorganisms of various sulfur-containing substrates in food debris, saliva, blood, and epithelial cells.
Out of all the patients examined and treated in Nubra Valley for dental ailments, around 80% were found to have halitosis with organoleptic scoring (sniff test) of 4–5 whereas the global incidence of severe halitosis is only 5%. The most common cause of halitosis in these people was found to be a local made smokeless chewable tobacco called “SUVIDHA” which is mixed with dried cow dung before consumption. This “SUVIDHA” packet contains tobacco, ash, oil, coloring agent, and flavored water. The contents of SUVIDHA are mixed with cow dung, which has been dried in summers for 4–5 days till it loses all the water content and then stocked. The tobacco and cow dung are mixed in 3:1 ratio, then rolled into a ball, and placed under the tongue/mucosa and are routinely sucked for 15–20 min [Figure 1]. There is a belief in local population that this tobacco keeps their mouth moist and helps in pain relief. Therefore, people are encouraged to start consuming it from very young age of around 15 years. This chewable tobacco adversely affects the oral cavity, and the presence of cow dung leads to peculiar pungent and decay smell. Tobacco and cow dung act as nidus for the growth of bacteria whereas hypoxia of HAAs stimulates the growth of anaerobic microorganisms., The bacterial colonies lead to periodontal pathologies, increased caries, tooth staining, erosion of teeth, and halitosis.
|Figure 1: The process of final product obtained after mixing tobacco and cow dung|
Click here to view
To improve the overall dental hygiene and limiting the incidence of halitosis, dental and medical officers can play an important role by teaching people how to maintain oral hygiene and educating them about the ill effects of tobacco and cow dung, by conducting various oral health awareness programs, dental camps and counselling sessions. Reinforcement of oral health awareness programs, teaching how to maintain oral hygiene, and its importance will help in limiting the halitosis and improving the overall dental hygiene.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Cortelli JR, Barbosa MD, Westphal MA. Halitosis: A review of associated factors and therapeutic approach. Braz Oral Res 2008;22 Suppl 1:44-54.
Salik A, Shaikh A, Gore A, Bhat MY, Lokhande N, Gupta A. Prevalence of halitosis and its correlation with various intraoral etiological factors: A cross sectional study. Ann Int Med Dent Res 2016;2:20-4.
Cagetti MG, Cocco F, Calzavara E, Augello D, Zangpoo P, Campus G. Life-conditions and anthropometric variables as risk factors for oral health in children in Ladakh, a cross-sectional survey. BMC Oral Health 2021;21:51.
Miyazaki H, Arao M, Okamura K, Kawaguchi Y, Toyofuku A, Hoshi K, et al
. Tentative classification of halitosis and its treatment needs. Niigata Dent J 1999;32:7-11.
Madhushankari GS, Yamunadevi A, Selvamani M, Mohan Kumar KP, Basandi PS. Halitosis-An overview: Part-I-Classification, etiology, and pathophysiology of halitosis. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2015;7:S339-43.
Mubeen K, Chandrashekhar H, kavitha M, Nagarathna S. Effect of tobacco on oral-health an overview. J Evol Med Dent Sci 2013;2:3523-34.